[Moon-net] Reception of HAARP 40m Lunar Echoes

[Dave Blaschke]

I heard both signals on 6.972.5 last night (this morning). I don't 
know which signal was the terrestrial and which was the echo, but as 
I turned my 40 meter beam, the stronger signal stayed the same 
strength. So, maybe that was the echo. With over three BILLION watts 
ERP, I would not doubt it. I'd sure hate to have to pay their power bill.

Dave, W5UN


At 19:39 1/20/2008, you wrote:
>Just the opposite here.  Direct was s0-s3 and moon echo was s9.  I thought
>it was the other way around until they stopped briefly and I suddenly
>realized the sequence.
>
>Are you sure you didn't have it reversed too?
>
>Thanks
>
>Mike, KL6M      BP51dc
>
> > Tonight (Jan. 20 utc) I ran Spectran with my FT-847 and a 66-foot
> > dipole at 30-feet.  I made 73 jpeg screen captures (one every
> > 60-seconds) and placed them on my website.  Each jpeg file averages
> > 130-145 Kb.  The direct sky-wave signal ran about S9 on the receiver
> > or about -15 dB on Spectran.  Echoes averaged S3 or -31 dB on
> > Spectran.  The images can be downloaded from
> > http://www.kl7uw.com/img0001.jpg thru
> > http://www.kl7uw.com/img0073.jpg. These screen captures either
> > grabbed the direct peak or the echo depending on capture time.  Time
> > notation on the images is Alaska Standard Time.
> > I hope these will be of some use to HAARP.
> >
> >
> > 73,
> > Ed - KL7UW
> > ======================================
> >   BP40IQ   50-MHz - 10-GHz   www.kl7uw.com
> > 144-EME: FT-847, mgf-1801, 4x-xpol-20, 185w
> > DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubususa at hotmail.com
> > ======================================
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moon-Net posting and subscription instructions are at
> > http://www.nlsa.com/nets/moon-net-help.html
> >
> >
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Moon-Net posting and subscription instructions are at 
>http://www.nlsa.com/nets/moon-net-help.html