[Moon-net] ARRL EME Contest

[Edward Cole]

The comment on calling CQ is the big discovery for me.
My QRPp signal (125w at 4x 3WL xpol) is too weak for contest stations 
to see with all the competition from QRO stations.
By calling CQ, I got a lot of activity from callers.  I would say my 
success rate was 1:4, so the addition of more RF output will produce 
big increase in worked stations.

73 Ed - KL7UW

At 11:31 AM 10/29/2007, w7mem at juno.com wrote:
>Hi All
>Hey how about a calling freq for JT ?? 144.110 for EU and 144.125 
>for NA and 144.075 JA??
>432.075 ??
>I miss using my SKED FREQ from OLD SCHOOL days (CW)  144.063 Maybe I 
>will use this one..144.163
>73 Mark
>
>
>
>Reminders to everyone:
>
>Even small stations should call CQ some of the time.  If you
>don't, there is little chance for you to make (unassisted)
>QSOs with other stations who use primarily S&P operating
>techniques.  If you call CQ, many of us can find you -- and
>we will certainly call!
>
>-- 73, Joe (K1JT) and Al (K2UYH)
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Moon-Net posting and subscription instructions are at 
>http://www.nlsa.com/nets/moon-net-help.html

73,
Ed - KL7UW
======================================
  BP40IQ   50-MHz - 10-GHz   www.kl7uw.com
144-EME: FT-847, mgf-1801, 4x-xpol-20, 185w
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubususa at hotmail.com
======================================