[Moon-net] It on again!

[Tierra del Mar Labs]

Change the silly rules to respect honest participants, so Peter and
Jerry can kiss their own shiny metal toys, as their toys are only what
is here and now, and should not be considered the state of the art.
Surely folks there is more monetary antenna systems to be displayed
soon.

Why does EME have to be a cry baby world, old timers???????????

So tired of these assholes, w7eme   Owen When do I get unplugged
anyway.....


-----Original Message-----
From: moon-net-bounces at list-serv.davidv.net
[mailto:moon-net-bounces at list-serv.davidv.net] On Behalf Of Doug
McArthur
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 2:11 AM
To: moon-net at list-serv.davidv.net; moon at moonbounce.info.
Subject: [Moon-net] It on again!

When is QSO not a QSO ... when it is conducted under the JT65xx
protocol.
Reference .. The ARRL definition of a Contact .. absolute irrefutable
fact.

Answer .. change the rules (ARRL) .. instigate a definition of the 
data protocol (viz G3LTF suggestion) and
                separate the modes (WSJT/CW).

even Mr Joe Taylor said
quote
26th April 2006 Moon-net
......" Digital communication modes are different.  Their quantities 
of information transfer can be measured objectively.  The QSO 
guidelines for traditional modes are an obvious and reasonable 
starting point, but you and others have persuaded me that we could 
benefit from having more explicit guidelines for digital QSOs -- 
probably something quantitative, something capable of establishing 
with objectively high confidence that the quantitative guidelines 
have been met."......
unquote

So don't get heated .. help by assisting to change the rules and lets
move on.

Regards
Doug VK3UM




_______________________________________________
Moon-Net posting and subscription instructions are at
http://www.nlsa.com/nets/moon-net-help.html