[Moon-net] 10 GHz polarization discussion at Wurzberg ??

[Jerry Kleker]

Hi Ivo,

ESPECIALLY BECAUSE THERE ARE 2 WELL KNOWN AND PRESTIGIOUS INDIVIDUALS
(WA7CJO AND WA5VJB) WHO HAVE INDIGNANTLY INSISTED THAT WE ALL SHOULD
STAY LINEAR!!!!

THERE WAS TO BE A VERY HEATED TECHNICAL DISCUSSION AT THIS YEAR'S EME
CONFERENCE BETWEEN WA7CJO AND S57UUU BUT S57UUU COULD NOT MAKE IT
DUE TO PERSONAL DIFFICULTIES! THE DISCUSSION NEVER TOOK PLACE!!!!

YOU AND I AND SOME OTHERS MAY AGREE THAT CIRCULAR IS THE WAY TO GO BUT
THIS IS WHAT ALL THE FUZZ IS ABOUT!!!!!!!! THERE ARE MANY MICROWAVE EME 
HAMS THAT DO NOT KNOW THAT A DICTATE WAS MADE AT THE 2002 EME 
CONFERENCE AT PRAGUE!!!!

73 es TNX for asking,

Jerry    W7QX

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ivo Chladek<mailto:zs6axt at telkomsa.net> 
  To: Jerry Kleker<mailto:w7qx at msn.com> 
  Cc: MOON-NET<mailto:moon-net at list-serv.davidv.net> 
  Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 11:34 AM
  Subject: Re: [Moon-net] 10 GHz polarization discussion at Wurzberg ??


  Hi all,
  I am not sure what is the fuzz about ! It was decided already in Progue 4
  years ago, that it is circular. How many times we have to re - decide ???

  73, Ivo, ZS6AXT

  ??


  > I understand that there was to be a discussion and debate about circular
  > versus linear polarization for 10 GHz EME.
  >
  > Did the debate take place?
  >
  > Was there a conclusion?
  >
  > Would somebody please report?
  >
  > Thank you es 73,
  >
  > Jerry   W7QX